Between Resilience and Adaptation: A Historical Framework for Understanding Stability and Transformation of Societies to Shocks and Stress

Abstract

How environmental stress affected past societies is an area of increasing relevance for contemporary planning and policy concerns. The paper below examines a series of case studies that demonstrate that short-term strategies that sustain a state or a specific bundle of vested interests did not necessarily promote longer-term societal resilienceSocietal resilience and often increased structural pressures leading to systemic crisis. Some societies or states possessed sufficient structural flexibility to overcome very serious short-term challenges without further exacerbating existing inequalities. But even where efforts were made consciously to assist the entire community the outcome often generated unpredictable changes with negative longer-term impacts. Greater degrees of baseline socio-economic inequalitySocio-economic inequality at the outset of a crisis are associated with less resilience in the system as a whole, a more uneven distribution of the resilience burden, and an increased risk of post-solution breakdown of a given social order. The historicalHistorical resilience case studies therefore indicate that future policy planners must consider structural socio-economic imbalances when designing and implementing responses to environmental challenges.

Publication Type
Book Section
Authors
John Haldon, Princeton University
Annelise Binois-Roman
Adam Izdebski, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Timothy Newfield, Georgetown University
Philip Slavin
Sam White, University of Helsinki
Konrad Wnęk
Date
Book
COVID-19: Systemic Risk and Resilience
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
ISBN
978-3-030-71587-8
Share