The complex and interdisciplinary nature of socio-environmental (S-E) problems has led to numerous efforts to develop organizing frameworks to capture the structural and functional elements of S-E systems. We evaluate six leading S-E frameworks, i.e., human ecosystem framework, resilience, integrated assessment of ecosystem services, vulnerability framework, coupled human-natural systems, and social-ecological systems framework, with the dual goals of (1) investigating the theoretical core of S-E systems research emerging across diverse frameworks and (2) highlighting the gaps and research frontiers brought to the fore by a comparative evaluation. The discussion of the emergent theoretical core is centered on four shared structuring elements of SE systems: components, connections, scale, and context. Cross-cutting research frontiers include: moving beyond singular case studies and small-n studies to meta-analytic comparative work on outcomes in related SE systems; combining descriptive and data-driven modeling approaches to SE systems analysis; and promoting the evolution and refinement of frameworks through empirical application and testing, and interframework learning.
Frontiers in socio-environmental research: components, connections, scale, and context
Abstract
Publication Type
Journal Article
Date
Journal
Ecology and Society
Share